This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
icnd1:nat [2024/03/14 07:47] 114.119.145.194 old revision restored (2023/10/07 23:06) |
icnd1:nat [2024/06/11 00:56] (current) 3.149.243.18 old revision restored (2024/03/14 08:01) |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 53: | Line 53: | ||
===== Chapter Questions ===== | ===== Chapter Questions ===== | ||
==== One ==== | ==== One ==== | ||
- | Examine the following show command output on a router configured for dynamic NAT: | + | **Examine the following show command output on a router configured for dynamic NAT:** |
< | < | ||
-- Inside Source | -- Inside Source | ||
Line 67: | Line 67: | ||
</ | </ | ||
- | The NAT pool does not have enough entries to satisfy all requests. | + | '' |
The problem is not related to NAT, based on the information in the command output. | The problem is not related to NAT, based on the information in the command output. | ||
Line 76: | Line 76: | ||
You answered this question correctly. × | You answered this question correctly. × | ||
- | Explanation: | + | **Explanation: |
The last line mentions that the pool has seven addresses, with all seven allocated, with the misses counter close to 1000 - meaning that close to 1000 new flows were rejected because of insufficient space in the NAT pool. | The last line mentions that the pool has seven addresses, with all seven allocated, with the misses counter close to 1000 - meaning that close to 1000 new flows were rejected because of insufficient space in the NAT pool. | ||
+ | ==== Two ==== | ||
+ | **Which of the following summarized subnets represent routes that could have been created for CIDR’s goal to reduce the size of Internet routing tables?** | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | 200.1.1.0 255.255.255.0 | ||
+ | |||
+ | '' | ||
+ | |||
+ | 10.1.0.0 255.255.0.0 | ||
+ | |||
+ | 10.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 | ||
+ | You answered this question correctly. × | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Explanation: | ||
+ | CIDR’s original intent was to allow the summarization of multiple Class A, B, and C networks to reduce the size of Internet routing tables. Of the answers, only 200.1.0.0 255.255.0.0 summarizes multiple networks. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== Three ==== | ||
+ | **With static NAT, performing translation for inside addresses only, what causes NAT table entries to be created?** | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | '' | ||
+ | |||
+ | The first packet from the inside network to the outside network | ||
+ | |||
+ | Configuration using the ip nat outside source command | ||
+ | |||
+ | The first packet from the outside network to the inside network | ||
+ | You answered this question correctly. × | ||
+ | |||
+ | Explanation: | ||
+ | With static NAT, the entries are statically configured. Because the question mentions translation for inside addresses, the inside keyword is needed in the command. |