icnd1:nat

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
icnd1:nat [2024/03/14 08:04]
114.119.149.71 old revision restored (2023/09/23 12:44)
icnd1:nat [2024/04/27 08:10] (current)
52.211.143.139 old revision restored (2023/11/01 22:20)
Line 67: Line 67:
 </code> </code>
    
-**The NAT pool does not have enough entries to satisfy all requests.**+The NAT pool does not have enough entries to satisfy all requests.
  
 The problem is not related to NAT, based on the information in the command output. The problem is not related to NAT, based on the information in the command output.
Line 76: Line 76:
 You answered this question correctly. × You answered this question correctly. ×
  
-**Explanation:**+Explanation:
 The last line mentions that the pool has seven addresses, with all seven allocated, with the misses counter close to 1000 - meaning that close to 1000 new flows were rejected because of insufficient space in the NAT pool. The last line mentions that the pool has seven addresses, with all seven allocated, with the misses counter close to 1000 - meaning that close to 1000 new flows were rejected because of insufficient space in the NAT pool.
-==== Two ==== 
-**Which of the following summarized subnets represent routes that could have been created for CIDR’s goal to reduce the size of Internet routing tables?** 
- 
-  
-200.1.1.0 255.255.255.0 
- 
-''**200.1.0.0 255.255.0.0**'' 
- 
-10.1.0.0 255.255.0.0 
- 
-10.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 
-You answered this question correctly. × 
- 
-**Explanation:** 
-CIDR’s original intent was to allow the summarization of multiple Class A, B, and C networks to reduce the size of Internet routing tables. Of the answers, only 200.1.0.0 255.255.0.0 summarizes multiple networks. 
icnd1/nat.1710403442.txt.gz · Last modified: 2024/03/14 08:04 by 114.119.149.71